« AOL Blows Up Another Sales Executive | Main | I Am the Media »
February 12, 2009
The Elephant in the TV Room
A front-page article in the February 10 issue of the Wall Street Journal detailed the disintegrating business model of local television stations. The story titled “Local TV Stations Face a Fuzzy Future” by Sam Schechner and Rebecca Dana was insightful, thoroughly researched, and well written. But there was one item that I found interesting, ironic, and indicative of a problem that television stations and networks have – the elephant in the TV room that no one talks about.
Until that disruptive wooly worm, the Internet, popped up, local TV stations effortlessly made money, but now they are struggling to figure out how to survive in the age of the Web. Audiences seem to be abandoning local TV stations’ most profitable franchises – local news. And even their networks might abandon them. Here’s what Schechner and Dana wrote:
The weakness in the local-TV market could hammer the big broadcast networks, says Randy Falco, former president and chief operating officer of the NBC Universal Television Group and now CEO of Time Warner Inc.'s AOL. Cable operators, he says, may lure networks away from some ailing stations with the promise of steady subscriber fees: "Ultimately one of [the networks] will make a break. One of them will try to make a go as a cable network."
The article’s authors interviewed people in network TV and at local stations. They quoted the pronouncements of TV network heads from their speeches at conferences. But Falco was the only source they quoted who is no longer in the TV industry; he’s CEO of AOL. Why would Schechner and Dana go to someone no longer in the business? Perhaps to get a point of view that was objective from an executive who’s no longer in a the-future-is-rosy mode all the time.
But why go to Falco? They probably interviewed randy Randy because he’s still viewed as a TV guy, even after two-and-a-half years at AOL. The TV business has changed dramatically in that time, but the two reporters probably figured that Falco must be keeping current on the TV business because he certainly hasn’t been paying attention to AOL.
I find it fascinating and ironic that Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes hired Falco because he was a successful TV sales guy (he ran NBC TV Network sales for years before he was upped to CEO of NBC’s Television Group) and that Falco has screwed up AOL precisely because he’s a TV sales guy and has no clue about the Internet or how to sell it, as AOL’s recent earning record proves.
I had lunch recently with the head of a PE company that owns a group of television stations, and we talked about how his group has an iron-clad rule about hiring salespeople: Never hire anyone with TV selling experience. He knew TV salespeople can’t sell their way out of a paper bag. I talked to the head of sales of a highly-trafficked, successful Web business recently, and he said he never even interviews people with TV sales experience. He knew that TV salespeople aren’t salespeople; that they are responders to RFPs and calls for avails – what we used to call package monkeys. This week I talked to the managing partner of a highly-respected media executive recruiting firm, and she said her firm had not had success placing TV salespeople in Web businesses. She knew TV salespeople were lazy and had no clue how to sell conceptually or create value; they’re commodity salespeople.
The notion that the vast majority of TV salespeople have no idea how to sell – you know, prospecting, qualifying, presenting and overcoming objections, creating value, closing, and, heaven forbid, servicing – is the elephant in the room. No one talks about it openly. Executives outside of the TV business know it, but those in the business make the fundamental attribution error so marvelously described by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in Fooled By Randomness. TV salespeople think they’re really smart because of all the billings they had. Now that the revenue is disappearing, they believe it’s all because of bad luck.
I don’t believe that TV salespeople caused the problem that’s occurring in local and network TV. The Web and the recession weren’t their fault. But TV executives and salespeople were thumping their chests for so long and touting their Titanic as unsinkable, that now I think they deserve to go down with the ship. Most smart Internet businesses do too – except for Jeff Bewkes at Time Warner who hired Randy Falco to run AOL.
Posted by Charles Warner at February 12, 2009 12:47 AM
Comments
Dana Harmon
at February 16, 2009 12:47 PM writes:
Charlie,
When I worked in Columbus, I observed the company's tv station and the quality of their sales force. All were making great money, but could not sell anything close to a direct client, because they didn't know how. If they could not pull a Strata report and submit it, they were lost. Radio salespeople have worked long and hard to discover client needs, present a viable option to those needs and create some compelling commercials to get people in the store.
I have never heard a tv salesperson talk about how their campaign was going to help their client's business grow. It's not in their thought process.
Great article, love your stuff.
Dana Harmon
Bruce Braun
at February 14, 2009 4:43 PM writes:
The reality with local TV stations is that outside of local news, they are dinosaurs. All of the broadcast networks would dump their affiliates in a heartbeat if they did not fear the wrath of the Congress and local DMA's. Converting CBS for example to an exclusive cable channel, would more than make up for the lost revenue they pay in affiliate compensation every year. In fact they could make considerably more money by charging subscriber fees to the local cable company....just like ESPN, USA or TBS. CBS would have two revenue streams, ad sales and subscriber fees. No more annual affiliate gatherings or having to listen to the bitching of local stations for whatever ticks them off on a given day. No more worrying about having follow FCC regulations. If CBS were a cable channel, they would not have any FCC obligation to serve any local community. No more overpaid local newsreaders or as comedian Mort Sahl called them..."the guys with the $50 haircuts on the $2.00 heads". No more local stations with 300 employees including unionized newsrooms and technical staffs, fleets of news vans and helicopters. In this new digital world, local stations are destined to go the path newspapers are now on. Local or regional cable news channels that currently exist in many markets can replace the O&O's for that local coverage. Affiliate local station newscasts have become nothing more than cross-promotional programs to promote the network prime-time shows anyway.
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)Printer-Friendly