« Oprah and the TV Dinosaur | Main | Pearl Harbor Day »
November 27, 2009
Thanksgiving Conversation in the Age of the Internet
I’m old fashioned. I grew up in an era when Thanksgiving dinner was a time not only for food but also for lively family conversations and catching up; but not today in the age of the internet.
At a recent Thanksgiving gathering, I noticed the younger people were more engrossed in their computers, iPhones, and TV (a Roku device streaming Netflix) than in conversation.
I’ll make a rough guess, probably based more on perception than reality, that of the six hours of hanging out before we sat down for dinner, that the amount of time spent on a computer, mobile phone, or watching TV was twice the time spent in conversation.
Was this self-absorption, narcissism, social anxiety, or the age of the internet? I suspect the major culprit was the internet, especially with those under 35 in the assembled clan.
I suspect that the younger people have, as Ken Auletta says in his book of the same name, been Googled. If they are curious about things and people, they use Google to get the answer, which is not necessarily an evil thing in itself, or, presumably, Google wouldn’t do it.
The problem is that the instant availability and accessibility of the world’s information has reduced the compulsion or desire, it appears, for social interaction. The internet has isolated people in their own private worlds, thus eliminating the need for social exchanges in person because Facebook does it much more efficiently and, more importantly, emotionlessly.
Young people tend to text, Tweet, or Facebook with each other instead of talking face to face or even over the phone (mobile, of course), I’m guessing because there is less expenditure of emotion, and fewer honest feeling exchanged. Like with a computer or iPhone, there’s no emotion, no feeling involved, and young people are used to interacting without their emotions being engaged, it seems. They have never seen a computer or iPone cry or laugh or fall in love or get angry; these devices just give up all the information in the world, but no feelings.
Also, as I wrote in a previous blog, “We tend to believe that lots of information is good for a democratic society, and in theory it is. However, in practice there is now so much information (content) available that it is possible by means of selective searches and selective perception to create an echo chamber so that opposing sounds are never heard.”
Not only are opposing sounds never heard, but also information that is not in our wheelhouse of immediate and intense interest is not searched for or noticed, thus increasing our narrowing polarization and isolation.
When I mentioned my observations about the Thanksgiving gathering to my good friend, Paul Talbot, he said, “If I had opened a computer, turned on the TV set, or looked at my cell phone during a family gathering my mom would have thrown me out of the house.”
If we had been at Paul’s mother’s house yesterday, all of us (including me) would have been outside and hungry – and deservedly so.
This incident has been a good reminder to me to shut down my internet devices when I’m with other people and to interact – to be curious and care about who other people are and how they feel. After all, I’m not an emotionless computer connected to the internet, or am I?
Posted by Charles Warner at November 27, 2009 5:27 PM
Comments
Bruce Braun
at December 2, 2009 8:10 PM writes:
It does not seem much longer than ten years ago, when the phone was our primary medium of personal communication, with email coming on strong. Now, the mobile phone is a smartphone and a tiny computer.
Today, a mobile phone is not a phone to those under 35. It is primarily a texting device, then a email device a web browser and lastly, a phone.
I speak from personal experience with an 18 year-old daughter!
I'm baffled to understand why this is. Hearing the sound of the human voice with all of the intonation and nuance, can never be replicated in 140 characters of text. Why all the avoidance of personal contact, at seemingly any cost?
It is easy, however, to hide behind those 140 characters if you want to avoid personal interaction. Interaction requires individual participation and cooperation and in this age of White House Party Crashers, Balloon Boys and Errant Pro Golfers.
That is, if all you are interested in, is the 15 minutes of fame that might land you a show on Bravo.
Sadly, I think we've come to that point of technological isolation.
If we are heading down a road to societal and cultural collapse, we've without a doubt invented and deployed the tech tools to accomplish it.
Aultta's book is a wonderful assessment of Google, the founders, and the Google culture. What frightens me about them is that their world, self-created society and business model is based upon and rooted in mathematical equations, algorithms, probability and possible outcomes The Google criteria of acceptance is so intellectually narrow as to be bigoted. People are hired at Google not on the basis of personal character and talent but instead upon mathematical standards based upon GPA's, class ranking and ability to solve or answer technology related brain teasers. If you are not as smart as they think they are, Google does not see any value in you as a person in their cloistered world.
If there is an equivalency to the Detroit auto assembly lines of the 1950's and 60's, Google has created an intellectual technological assembly line for this generation. The working conditions may be nicer but the net result is the same.
At the end of the day, Google fools itself into thinking their culture will benefit mankind, and in many ways it does.
What does not happen, and to your point Charlie, is personal communication and interaction.
Google should worry more about how we can produce great writers, than digitizing what has already been written since the dawn of the printed page.
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)Printer-Friendly